Forecast SaV No 4 Editorial

Edi torial

It's time for STRONG LONGEVITY SELF DEFENCE, see pages 15-17 in this issue. To * Those who KNOW that only through intensi ve muscle training (myokines - please google) can you live a reasonably healthy and independent life into very old age 100+, stay " everyday FIT" and preferably not burden the healthcare system. Anyone who is ill and has not taken care of their body all their life (alcohol, meat consumption, cigarettes, medication) should prove their health status by undergoing a test from the age of 70. In fact, in the future they could be forced to swallow the deadly pill (see science fiction film from 1979 refer ring to the year 2022, SOYLENT GREEN). The Longevity Lie

Have you noticed? The new term is everywhere: LONGEVITY. Who is really interested in longevity? The LONGEVITY events that I have attended or read about are designed to sell one thing under the pretext of longevity in good health: PILLS! No country is really interested in prolonging the lives of its citizens as they become an increasing financial burden with age. They have done their lifelong duty to pay taxes and contribute to the pensions of those alrea dy retired. From the state's point of view, the best time to So let's think further: if older people are simply seen as a burden on the community, pol itics could decide to set a ma ximum life expectancy beyond which only those who are in perfect health and therefore do not burden health insurance, or those who are ill but wealthy and can pay for their own treat ment, would be allowed to live. Does it sound like science fiction? That's why I'm convinced that there will soon be a witch hunt against older people. Pessimism or realism? Why should older people be allowed to live longer than 70 when care costs are continually rising and there is a lack of caring staff? Subsequent generations could resort to punitive actions on the street and carry out tar geted attacks against older people because they are no longer wanted. Organ donation: In various countries in Europe, organ donation is MANDATORY. In the event of death, organ removal is possible unless otherwise indicated during life. In other words, my body would become collective property. Only an explicit objection would prevent the removal of one's own organs. But in the event of an ac cident, when time is running out, would the medical staff have time to check my choice? Or should I have my decision tattooed on my forehead if I do NOT want my organs to be donated? By analogy, I consider the prede termined lifespan scenario to be possible. Suddenly my visions no longer seem so unrealistic. die is the first day of retirement. In matters of death, it should be noted that dying with dignity is a purely personal matter.

The biggest demographic ca tastrophe is not only the low birth rates in Europe, but also the low wages that young people are increasingly being paid. This means they can neither afford a family nor pay into a good old-age pension, let alone finance pensioners.

It was actually my intention to organise a LONGEVITY con gress in Locarno on 6 Novem ber 2024 to show the relevant authorities and the interested public an alternative and cur rently completely unconventio nal way to age well. But given the circumstances, if institutions do not Take the time to partici pate, it makes no sense to or ganise speakers who address an audience of people already

familiar * with the subject, namely the insiders. Such participants are already familiar with the subject. Yours Jean-Pierre

Jean-Pierre Leonhard Schupp Born 1954, Biological age "54", Health expert, book author, 5th Dan Black Belt Karate/kick-boxing, Curriculum vitae and contact; info@strongandvital.com

STRONG and VITAL No. 4 - 2024

5